There was a Stanford prison experiment

1. Grammarly 검수 Ver.

There is a Stanford prison experiment.

Psychologists collected and gathered people randomly.

Their mission was the following;

Basically people were divided into two groups.

For example, A group played a role as prison officer. B group played a role as prisoners.

So only thing that they had to do was staying in the pseudo-prion for one week.

There was no required action and no actual role.

On the first day, A and B group got along with each other. They had the chat about who they were, where they were from and so on.

But as time went by, A group started to give B group physical punishment. As well, mental punishment.

B group just said, why are you doing so like that? They felt very surprised at A group's behavior.

At the end of this experiment, both of A and B group were absorbed in their role even though nobody pushed them to play their roles.

It implies people would be spurred to behave in the way of people's nature which is evil when context is associated with it.

My point is that context is sub-parameter rather than the main one. Actually being evil is the main one.

 

 

2. ChatGPT 검수 기본 Ver.

Here is the corrected text:

"There was a Stanford prison experiment in which psychologists randomly selected participants. The mission was to divide them into two groups: Group A played the role of prison officers, while Group B played the role of prisoners. They had to stay in the pseudo-prison for one week, but there were no required actions or actual roles.

 

On the first day, both groups got along with each other and had chats about themselves. However, as time passed, Group A started to give Group B physical and mental punishment, which surprised them.

 

By the end of the experiment, both Group A and B were absorbed in their roles, even though nobody pushed them to play their parts. This implies that people can behave in evil ways if the context encourages it.

 

My point is that context is a sub-parameter, rather than the main one. Being evil is the primary parameter."

 

 

3. ChatGPT 검수 Natural Ver.

Certainly! Here's a more natural-sounding version of the proofread text:

 

In the Stanford prison experiment, psychologists randomly selected participants and divided them into two groups. Group A played the role of prison officers, while Group B played the role of prisoners. Their mission was to stay in the pseudo-prison for a week, but there were no specific actions or roles required.

 

Initially, both groups got along and chatted about themselves, but over time, Group A started punishing Group B physically and mentally, which surprised them.

 

By the end of the experiment, both groups were fully absorbed in their roles, even though nobody pushed them to play their parts. This suggests that people may behave in evil ways if the context encourages it.

 

My point is that the context plays a significant role in people's behavior, but it's not the only factor. Being evil can be a part of people's nature, and it may come out when the context is associated with it.

 

 

4. ChatGPT 검수 Native Ver.

Certainly, here's a more native-style version of the proofread text:

 

The Stanford prison experiment involved psychologists randomly selecting participants and dividing them into two groups. Group A assumed the role of prison officers, while Group B took on the part of prisoners. Their task was to spend a week in the pseudo-prison, without any specific actions or roles required.

 

Initially, both groups got along well and engaged in conversation about themselves. However, over time, Group A began to subject Group B to physical and mental punishment, which came as a surprise to them.

 

As the experiment progressed, both groups became fully engrossed in their roles, despite no one directing them to do so. This suggests that people may exhibit evil behavior when the context encourages it.

 

My point is that while the context plays a significant role in determining people's behavior, it's not the only factor. Evil behavior can be a part of people's nature and may surface when the context is associated with it.